S.D.Fla.: Former lawyer could not sue Disciplinary Counsel in bankruptcy after already losing in another similar case

Plaintiff is a former lawyer who sued the Pennsylvania Office of Disciplinary Counsel alleging Fourth Amendment violations from seizure of his office files. After losing that case, he attempted to relitigate the same issue through bankruptcy court. He is collateral estopped. Feingold v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49311 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 26, 2018).

The luxury car defendant was driving, even assuming standing, that he couldn’t prove he had permission to drive, was unlicensed, he was unlicensed, and would have otherwise been left unattended subject to theft or vandalism was properly impounded. United States v. Magdirila, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48602 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Inventory. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.