GA: No IAC for not challenging nonprejudicial typo in the SW affidavit

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress the search warrant for defendant’s cell phones for a typographical error on the date of the alleged offense in the application for the warrant. The affidavit was clear what was to be searched. “He has not alleged, other than in conclusory terms, that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s failure to attempt to suppress the evidence obtained under the search warrants.” There is no prejudice. Dent v. State, 2018 Ga. LEXIS 98 (Feb. 21, 2018).

Civil detainees have limited Fourth Amendment rights for the purpose of institutional security. Johanneck v. Ahlin, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28004 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Warrant requirement. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.