TN: Disclaiming any interest in the contents of a car means no standing in the contents

Defendant told the police that nothing in the car was his, so he didn’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents. Therefore, his defense counsel couldn’t be ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress the search. Dunn v. State, 2017 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 975 (Nov. 20, 2017).*

Defendant’s stop that he ran away from was with probable cause. State v. Croff, 2017-Ohio-8629, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 5051 (11th Dist. Nov. 20, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.