ND: Separate state constitutional search argument has to be developed to be considered

Appellant’s “unconstitutional condition” argument under the Fourth Amendment has already been rejected in this case, and the state consitutitonal argument wasn’t developed. Marman v. Levi, 2017 ND 133, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 133 (June 7, 2017).*

Defendant’s untimely motion for new trial waived her motion to suppress. State v. Brown, 2017 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 475 (June 7, 2017).*

This entry was posted in State constitution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.