AR: Reasonable suspicion doesn’t require certainty of facts

Reasonable suspicion doesn’t require certainty of facts. Here, the factual belief was that defendant’s DL had been suspended weeks earlier. Williams v. State, 2017 Ark. App. 291, 2017 Ark. App. LEXIS 301 (May 10, 2017).

Defendant’s plea waived his potential suppression issue. In his 2255, he doesn’t say how the suppression issue has any merit. Courtney v. United States, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73576 (S.D. Fla. May 12, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.