CA3: An apparent burglar has no REP or standing to challenge entry

“Martin testified that Lewis did not have a key to her home and did not have permission to be at her residence at the time of arrest. Because she did not leave Lewis in her home when she left, she concluded that he must have broken in. Her testimony demonstrates that Lewis did not have permission to come and go as he pleased, and nothing in the record indicates that he was viewed ‘like family,’ with open access to the residence. Lewis thus had no reasonable expectation of privacy there when he was arrested.” United States v. Lewis, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 22886 (3d Cir. Dec. 21, 2016).

This entry was posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.