D.Me.: Officer doesn’t have to articulate the RS for continuing the stop

The officer doesn’t have a constitutional obligation to tell (“articulate”) the suspect the reasonable suspicion that forms the basis of the stop. “Cf. Devenpeck v. Alford, 543 U.S. 146, 155 (2004) (‘While it is assuredly good police practice to inform a person of the reason for his arrest at the time he is taken into custody, we have never held that to be constitutionally required.’).” United States v. Williams, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159028 (D.Me. Nov. 15, 2016).

Defendant’s guilty plea didn’t preserve his search issue, so it’s waived. State v. Wooddell, 2016-Ohio-7752, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 4618 (5th Dist. Nov. 9, 2016).*

The traffic stop transformed into a mere encounter, and defendant’s consent was voluntary. That led to finding a box welded under the vehicle full of cocaine. Commonwealth v. Randolph, 2016 PA Super 253, 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 671 (Nov. 16, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.