TN: Revocation of consent has to happen before the search

The state proved defendant consented to a blood draw. Revocation of consent came after the blood draw and was too late. State v. Dotson, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 503 (July 13, 2016).

Late night stop of a known gang member in a high crime area justified a patdown for weapons. State v. Thip, 2016-Ohio-4970, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 2760 (10th Dist. July 14, 2016).

This entry was posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.