CADC: When the govt learns heroin dealers’ pattern for pick up and delivery, further acts matching the pattern are probable cause

Defendants were known heroin dealers, and they followed a pattern in travel. On the trip that resulted in their arrest, GPS data and cell site location information put them together following the same pattern, and that was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Burnett, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12549 (D.C.Cir. July 8, 2016).

Defendant’s making jail calls that he knew were being monitored and recorded had no reasonable expectation of privacy in them. State v. Willis, 2016 Tenn. LEXIS 405 (July 6, 2016).

This entry was posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.