N.D.Ill.: Def not credible where he contradicted under oath at suppression hearing his Pretrial Services interview on drug use

Defendant’s credibility at the suppression hearing was blown by his contradictory statements to Pretrial Services about his drug use. He directly contradicted under oath what he told them. Therefore, the court believes the government’s version of events. United States v. Mayorga, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82185 (N.D.Ill. June 24, 2016) (§ 60.48 n.9).

Defendant was found to have consented to the taking of DNA even though he had been in custody for 24 hours. Steele v. State, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 369 (June 24, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Consent. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.