CA6: Nervousness and reaching under seat were not reasonable suspicion

Nervousness with reaching under seat alone were not sufficient for reasonable suspicion. The court analyzed at length the purported justification of the license plate light being out, which the court noted was working in the video of the stop, but still did not second guess it. [Instead, it appears that the court was trying to find a way to suppress the search for an alternative reason rather than call the officer a liar.] United States v. Blair, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13216, 2008 FED App. 0171P (6th Cir. May 2, 2008):

We are left with Officer Holmes’s testimony that Blair was unusually nervous and was reaching under the seats. As we previously have noted, nervousness is “an unreliable indicator, especially in the context of a traffic stop. Many citizens become nervous during a traffic stop, even when they have nothing to hide or fear.” United States v. Richardson, 385 F.3d 625, 630-31 (6th Cir. 2004) (citing United States v. Saperstein, 723 F.2d 1221, 1228 (6th Cir. 1983)). And while evasive behavior is a pertinent factor in determining reasonable suspicion, Wardlow, 528 U.S. at 124, Blair’s act of reaching under the seats, without more, does not justify a Terry stop.

Based on the totality of the circumstances, therefore, we hold that Officer Holmes did not possess the reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity necessary to extend the scope and duration of the stop. As a result, Officer Holmes’s prolonged detention of Blair was not justified at its inception and therefore was not a valid Terry stop. Accordingly, the stop violated the Fourth Amendment, and all evidence seized as a result of the stop must be suppressed as “fruits of the poisonous tree.” Hill, 195 F.3d at 264.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.