E.D.Mich.: Def was told he wasn’t under arrest but he could have been; search incident valid

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and he was told he was being placed in handcuffs because the officer was unaware of who he was and that that did not mean he was going to jail. A patdown produced drugs. At the time of the patdown, there was cause for an arrest, and the search was valid as a search incident. United States v. Gibbs, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21431 (E.D.Mich. Feb. 23, 2016).

There was probable cause for the affidavit for search warrant, contrary to the USMJ’s conclusion. Moreover, it was not bare bones either, so the good faith exception would apply, too. United States v. Nagy, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21082 (N.D.W.Va., Feb. 22, 2016).*

The officer had reasonable suspicion that defendant’s tractor trailer was carrying drugs somewhere to use a drug dog during the stop. The log book wasn’t complete, and it showed he started in McAllen, Texas, a border town where he stayed for nine days, unusual for a trucker. The log book generally showed him driving around Indiana, and never to Texas but for that one trip. Defendant was excessively nervous. Finally, he had a 48′ trailer rather than the normal 53′ trailer, and more drugs are found in 48′ trailers. United States v. Quintanilla, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20738 (N.D.Ind. Feb. 22, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.