D.D.C.: SEC subpoena for company emails was narrow and complied with Fourth Amendment

An SEC subpoena was narrow and directed at company emails. It complied with the Fourth Amendment. The third party doctrine is not involved. United States SEC v. Karroum, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164718 (D.D.C. Dec. 9, 2015).

Petitioner raised a search and seizure question on direct appeal, and law of the case prohibits relitigation in a § 2255. Bernal v. United States, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163764 (D. Ariz. Nov. 5, 2015), adopted 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163762 (D. Ariz. Dec. 7, 2015).*

Defendant’s guilty plea waived his search issue. McMickle v. State, 2015 Miss. App. LEXIS 651 (Dec. 8, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.