CA1: Def consented to entry to serve an order of protection and sawed off shotgun hanging on wall was in plain view

Officers came to defendant’s house to serve a domestic abuse order of protection. He motioned for them to enter. They asked about guns, and defendant motioned to the wall where two guns were on display, one of which was a sawed off shotgun. The officer testified that he hadn’t yet noticed the gun but would have as soon as he looked away from the defendant. The consent was not coerced, and the guns were in plain view and he was a convicted felon. The court declines to decide defendant’s “intriguing” but unnecessary self-incrimination question. United States v. Gamache, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11586 (1st Cir. July 6, 2015).

Officers received an armed robbery call and stopped the only vehicle heading from the small area where it happened. The occupants stopped, bailed, and fled dropping a gun. On the totality there was no probable cause for the stop and arrest. Because they were illegally arrested, the search incident fails. Because of the unique shirt one was wearing, the photo array was suggestive. People of the V.I. v. Tyson, 2015 V.I. LEXIS 77 (Super.Ct. June 30, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.