CA10: Where no emergency suggested, welfare check entry violated Fourth Amendment

The officer here came to serve a summons at plaintiff’s house, and he looked through the window and saw the place was in disarray. He went to the door, and it was unlocked. He never knocked. He decided to perform a welfare check and entered with another officer with guns drawn and flashlights, finding the plaintiff asleep with a window air conditioner on near her head. There was no indication whatsoever that there was a need to enter. The fact there may have been guns inside was meaningless without some indication that they would be used. Plaintiff testified she felt “violated” by them rousting her from bed dressed as she was. No qualified immunity because nothing in the record supported exigent circumstances for the entry. McInerney v. King, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11265 (10th Cir. June 30, 2015).

Turning too wide is a traffic offense that justifies a stop. State v. Rainier, 2015 Ida. App. LEXIS 56 (June 24, 2015).*

Defendant’s house was searched for stolen property and drugs. Instead of deciding that search incident supported the search of his person at the scene, the court goes with inevitable discovery that he would have inevitably been searched anyway. [Which is backdooring the same issue they wouldn’t decide.] State v. Rowland, 2015 Ida. App. LEXIS 55 (June 24, 2015).

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Inevitable discovery, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.