W.D.La.: By requesting a tax reassessment, plaintiff did not consent to an entry onto the curtilage or an entry into the property

By requesting a tax reassessment, plaintiff did not consent to an entry onto the curtilage or an entry into the property for the reassessment. King v. La. Tax Comm’n, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80012 (W.D.La. June 19, 2015).

Defendant’s stop was based on a traffic offense, but he had admittedly already received information from other officers that defendant was involved in a drug transaction, and that was reasonable suspicion. Royston v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 6177 (Tex.App.–Houston (14th Dist. June 18, 2015) (dissent).*

This case involved a battery of a teacher putting his arms around and attempting to kiss a student at school who had been repeatedly contacted via Facebook and refused advances. The arrest came with a search warrant for the defendant’s house and electronics to verify the Facebook messages. Given the deference given search warrants, probable cause and nexus was shown. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Will, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79887 (N.D.W.Va. June 19, 2015),* adopting United States v. Will, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79883 (N.D.W.Va. April 29, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.