W.D.Mo.: PC and scope of search are matters usually decided on the papers without a hearing

If the question is probable cause for and scope of the warrant, a hearing is not really required. Here, the subject matter was contraband untaxed cigarettes moved interstate, and there was a substantial basis for issuing the search warrant. The scope of the warrant for financial records was justified. The case involved over $250,000 in untaxed cigarettes in one shipment, but there were others. United States v. Parry, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15785 (W.D.Mo. January 20, 2015).

The particular search and seizure claim raised in this 2255 can’t be raised now under Stone v. Powell. The particular issue now, the failure to object to the state trial judge signing the search warrant being the father of the affiant police officer, it could have been a strategic choice. At bottom, however, he can’t show that the outcome would have been different if the motion to suppress had been won. Watson v. United States, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15193 (E.D. Tenn. February 9, 2015).*

There was probable cause for defendant’s arrest for pimping, so the things found on him were found in a search incident. United States v. Daniels, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15291 (N.D.Ga. February 9, 2015),* R&R 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182096 (N.D.Ga. October 23, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Probable cause, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.