S.D.W.Va.: There was reasonable suspicion for a slight delay of an Express Mail package

“In what has become a large line of cases, a number of federal circuits have found that a combination of similar factors created reasonable suspicion to seize a package. The Court has no problem finding reasonable suspicion based solely on the several profiling factors met by Defendant’s package. Hackney’s statement that Defendant’s name had come up in the context of criminal investigations related to illegal drugs provides additional support, but the Court would find reasonable suspicion without it.” United States v. Kent, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11063 (S.D. W.Va. January 30, 2015).

Dog sniff around a motorcycle within the time period to complete the normal traffic ticket was reasonable and did not extend the stop. United States v. Ewing, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12573 (S.D.Ill. February 3, 2015).*

2255 petitioners couldn’t show that defense counsel were ineffective for not stressing more the fact the search warrant was executed at midnight. The district court and Tenth Circuit considered the late hour of the search in finding it reasonable. United States v. Rhone, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12931 (D.Kan. February 4, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.