CO: While defendant was not an authorized driver of a rental car, she had standing in her own packages in the car

Although defendant was not an authorized driver of the rental car stopped by police for a traffic violation, defendant had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the gift-wrapped packages in that car, which she continually asserted were hers and were being taken to her daughter, and thus, defendant had standing to challenge the trooper’s search of those packages. People v. Sotelo, 2014 CO 74, 2014 Colo. LEXIS 876 (October 14, 2014).

This was an excessive force case tried to the court without a jury. Based on the conflicting testimony, the court can’t say that the defense verdict was unsupported. Williams v. Dohm, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2475 (La.App. 1 Cir. October 14, 2014).*

Defendant’s search and other claims can’t be brought as a successive petition where he was already denied a COA. United States v. Banks, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 19726 (3d Cir. October 15, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.