FL1: No standing in disclaimed cell phone seized from own house

Defendant didn’t have standing to contest the seizure of cell phones she expressly disclaimed ownership in just because they were taken out of her house. State v. Fosmire, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5739 (Fla. 1st DCA April 22, 2014).*

Defense counsel didn’t pursue appeal of the search claim denied at trial because it was inconsistent with the denial defense raised at trial. No IAC shown. Jennings v. State, 2014 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 373 (April 17, 2014).*

Because there was probable cause, a search warrant wasn’t needed for a search of defendant’s vehicle under the automobile exception. State v. Reeves, 2014 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 372 (April 17, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.