OH11: Finding meth lab in house during arrest was both PC and exigency

Officers were at the door of the house where defendant lived executing an arrest warrant on a woman. She answered the door in her underwear, was told she was under arrest, and she said she needed clothes. Officers came in while she got clothes. At a door inside, an officer knocked, and defendant opened the door, and the smell of an operating methamphetamine lab was evident. That was both probable cause and exigent circumstances. State v. Campbell, 2013-Ohio-5823, 2013 Ohio App. LEXIS 6118 (11th Dist. December 31, 2013).*

The totality of circumstances supported the conclusion that methamphetamine would be found in defendant’s home, justifying the search warrant. The trial court’s use of “fair possibility” rather than “fair probability” is considered only a typo, not a misapplication of the state’s burden as reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause. State v. Poff, 2013-Ohio-5820, 2013 Ohio App. LEXIS 6125 (11th Dist. December 31, 2013).*

The finding of the trial court suppressing the stop of defendant was based on the video and the totality of the circumstances, and it is supported by the evidence. State v. Jarosz, 2013-Ohio-5839, 5 N.E.3d 1102 (11th Dist. 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.