NJ: Davis good faith exception saves pre-Neely lack of SW in DUI cases

Davis good faith means that the McNeely DUI warrant requirement won’t be applied to cases before it was decided, and McNeely isn’t retroactive. State v. Adkins, 433 N.J. Super. 479, 81 A.3d 680 (2013).

The affidavit for the search warrant was thin, but, considering the deference given warrants, it was enough under Ventresca and Gates. Here, however, there was more because it was undisputed that the officer gave additional information to the issuing magistrate, but couldn’t remember the details. What he remembered of those unrecorded details, however, were sufficient to get over the bar. [Lack of recordation should be a bigger deal; come on.] United States v. Jackson, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178374 (E.D. Mo. November 15, 2013), adopted 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177619 (E.D. Mo. December 17, 2013).*

Officers had exigent circumstances for a warrantless entry into defendant’s apartment. He was armed and believed to have just been involved in a robbery, and there was a small child inside. United States v. Evans, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 25321, 2013 FED App. 1030N (6th Cir. December 16, 2013).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.