CA9: Jones argument waived, and it can’t be the basis of a motion for new trial

Even though Jones is retroactive to cases on direct review, defense counsel never filed a motion to suppress on that ground so it’s waived. “Jones may have bolstered Johnson’s legal argument for suppression of the GPS evidence, but that cannot serve as a basis for a new trial.” United States v. Johnson, 537 Fed. Appx. 717 (9th Cir. 2013).*

Only reasonable suspicion was needed for defendant’s stop, but it’s apparent there was probable cause. The stop was valid. United States v. Goss, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16634 (4th Cir. August 12, 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.