NYT: A Spur in the Filibuster Fight: A Court’s Workload and Politics

NYT: A Spur in the Filibuster Fight: A Court’s Workload and Politics by Adam Liptak:

WASHINGTON — The overhaul of the Senate’s filibuster rules was prompted, surprisingly, by an argument about judicial productivity.

Republicans said President Obama’s nominees to three open seats on a federal appeals court in Washington were not needed because the court does not have enough to do.

But trying to quantify the workload of the court, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, “is a statistical food fight,” said Russell Wheeler, an expert on the federal courts at the Brookings Institution. The real issue, he said, was “the ideological balance of the court.”

One can’t help but have a warm place in the heart for a court where United States v. Maynard came from that led to United States v. Jones, written by a Republican appointee, no less.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.