OH8: Single trash pull does not show PC for SW for house

A single trash pull, without more, is not probable cause of possession of drugs. State v. Jones, 2013-Ohio-4915, 2013 Ohio App. LEXIS 5109 (8th Dist. November 7, 2013):

{¶14} Further, the [trial] court stated that

[A]dditional investigation including, multiple trash pulls over a period of time; surveillance, the details of which are set forth in an affidavit that gives facts of usage, trafficking and other circumstances giving rise of drug activity, controlled buys, observation of CRI from inside the house etc., was necessary for probable cause to be established – one trash pull is not necessarily sufficient. The detective should have taken additional steps, instead of cutting off the investigation prematurely.

{¶15} We see no reason to conclude otherwise. In State v. Weimer, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 92094, 2009-Ohio-4983, this court analyzed a single trash pull of a Euclid residence that revealed evidence of recent drug activity. The court, while acknowledging the legality of the trash pull, noted that the discovery of the discarded contraband must be viewed in isolation. Specifically, the court stated that when viewed in isolation, “it [did] not necessarily render the continued presence of suspected cocaine in her home probable, and [did] not, of itself, give rise to probable cause to issue a search warrant.” See also United States v. Elliot, 576 F.Supp. 1579 (S.D. Ohio 1984).

{¶16} This court, in reaching its decision, acknowledged the line of cases upholding warrants based upon evidence garnered from single trash pulls. Weimer. This court noted that in those cases, the facts underlying probable cause were much stronger and included extensive and continuous surveillance by police and heavy foot traffic to and from the known target residence of the suspected drug dealer that is indicative of drug transactions. Id.; see also State v. Williams, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 98100, 2013-Ohio-368.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.