E.D.Pa.: Old outdated information that wasn’t corroborated didn’t provide RS for stop

Old outdated information that wasn’t corroborated didn’t provide reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop. Thus, the detention thereafter failed, too. United States v. Cardona, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158103, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158126 (E.D. Pa. November 5, 2013):

In sum, the only relevant information (i.e., assertions of illegality) provided by the CI was notably vague and outdated. In light of the unreliability of the information provided by the CI, “some unquantifiable but significant amount of corroborating information [was] required to establish reasonable suspicion” to stop Cardona’s vehicle, and the record is devoid of that evidence. See Brown, 448 F.3d at 252. For that reason, we conclude that the initial stop of Cardona’s vehicle was unreasonable within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.

2. Subsequent Detention

Even if we were to assume Officer Cullen had reasonable suspicion to initially stop Cardona’s vehicle (he did not), we conclude that the seizure was nonetheless invalid because the Terry stop turned into a de facto arrest, for which no probable cause existed.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.