AR: SW can be executed by any officer in the county; an interlocal agreement not required

An interlocal agreement is not required for a law enforcement officer to execute a search warrant anywhere in the county. Such a search is not per se unreasonable. State v. Robinson, 2013 Ark. 425 (October 31, 2013):

Looking at the totality of the circumstances in this case, we conclude that the circuit court erred in granting Appellee’s motion to suppress because it was not per se unreasonable for the Sherwood officers to execute this search warrant. Pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated § 16-82-201 (Repl. 2005), any judicial officer has the authority to issue a search warrant directed to any person or place in Arkansas. Here, it is undisputed that the search warrant was properly issued by a judge in the Sherwood District Court of Pulaski County.

Rule 13.3(a) of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure plainly states that a search warrant may be executed by any officer. The officers in this case were the ones investigating the robbery and were the ones who obtained the information used to secure both the search warrant and the arrest warrant. There was no dispute regarding the validity of either warrant, as the dispute related solely to the execution of the search warrant. There was nothing to indicate that the Sherwood police purposefully avoided notifying other law enforcement agencies. Accordingly, under the totality of the circumstances and in view of the applicable statutory authority, court rules, and our case law, we cannot say that the execution of the search warrant was per se unreasonable such that it warranted suppression of the evidence seized.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.