N.D.Ohio: Daubert doesn’t apply to SW process

The government doesn’t have to comply with Daubert in an affidavit for search warrant to show that investigative procedures in a child pornography case were reliable. United States v. Pirosko, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146754 (N.D. Ohio October 10, 2013):

Additionally, Defendant asserts that the Court should apply the Daubert standard in order to determine probable cause. Daubert provides the standard for admitting scientific testimony in a trial. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). There is no precedent or authority demanding that the Daubert reliability standard must be applied to investigative procedures used by law enforcement in order for the search warrant to contain probable cause for the search, nor does Daubert hold that this standard must be applied to the probable cause analysis. Therefore the Court rejects this argument. Here, the affidavit in question included a sworn statement by the affiant that the investigative procedure used was reliable, as determined by many previous investigations employing this same procedure.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.