IL: There is no such thing in Illinois as a “motion to quash arrest”

There is no such thing in Illinois as a “motion to quash arrest.” People v. Ramirez, 2013 IL App (4th) 121153, 996 N.E.2d 1227 (2013):

[*P56] Throughout this opinion, we have advisedly put the term “motion to quash arrest” in quotation marks so as to avoid giving any legitimacy to such a motion. In fact, such motions possess none. “Motions to quash arrest” are nowhere recognized in the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Code) (see 725 ILCS 5/100-1 through 122-7 (West 2010)). Defendant’s “motion to quash arrest” stated that it was being made pursuant to section 114-12 of the Code (725 ILCS 5/114-12 (West 2010)), but that is clearly wrong. That section, which is entitled “Motion to Suppress Evidence Illegally Seized,” sets forth the procedure to be used when a defendant, who is “aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure,” seeks to suppress the evidence that the police obtained as the result thereof. 725 ILCS 5/114-12(a) (West 2010). That section contains no reference to “quashing arrests.”

[*P57] This court recently had occasion to discuss why the filing of a “motion to quash arrest” makes no sense. In People v. Hansen, 2012 IL App (4th) 110603, ¶¶ 62-63, 968 N.E.2d 164, we wrote the following: …

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.