WI: Dog sniff invalid because stop was unreasonably extended to conduct it

Dog sniff invalid because stop was unreasonably extended to conduct it. Defendant’s DL and paperwork had been returned. State v. House, 2012AP2414-CR (August 14, 2013):

¶8 The State points us to the reasonableness test set forth in Arias balancing the “public interest and the individual’s right to personal security free from arbitrary interference by law officers.” Id., ¶38 (quoting Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106, 109 (1977)). While this analysis helps quantify the reasonableness of a seizure during an ongoing stop, the seizure is still subject to the Terry test – that a seizure is reasonable only if it is justified at its inception and is “reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.” Arias, 311 Wis. 2d 358, ¶30 (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 19-20).

¶9 Here, unlike in Arias, the dog sniff attendant to House’s seizure occurred after Hoell had completed everything related to the initial stop. Hoell ran House’s license and conducted the dog sniff after he gave House back his license and issued him a warning. See State v. Jones, 2005 WI App 26, ¶22, 278 Wis. 2d 774, 693 N.W.2d 104 (traffic stop ended with the issuance of the warning citation and return of the defendant’s and the driver’s identification cards).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.