E.D.Tenn.: Lack of reference to time to serve a search warrant not prejudicial where served within hours

A search warrant that had no time limit to execution where Rule 41 says 14 days, was issued at 3:08 pm and was served the same day, is hardly prejudicial to the defendant. United States v. Manning, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104018 (E.D. Tenn. July 16, 2013).

The state and the Colville Tribe had concurrent criminal jurisdiction over a theft offense on the Colville Indian Reservation. While statute did not explicitly state that the state could execute a search warrant there, it did not prohibit it. The search warrant and the prosecution did not interfere with tribal sovereignty. State v. Clark, 178 Wn.2d 19, 308 P.3d 590 (2013).

A criminal defense lawyer of 20 years was disbarred for obtaining a court file from the clerk and then altering the docket sheet to change findings to cover up that he did not ask for a motion to suppress. In re Kamb, No. 200,926-3 (Wash. July 18, 2013).* [What happens to police officers who alter reports or make up false reports about searches and seizures? Hardly ever anything. This guy deserved disbarment because falsifying papers about the need for the search, how it occurred, and what was done about it is a crime against the administration of justice. Such errant cops deserve the same thing.]

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.