OH2: Stop continued on a “hunch,” and consent was invalid

Defendant’s stop was prolonged because it was based on a “hunch” and not reasonable suspicion. The consent granted after that was not voluntary. The state had the burden and it failed. State v. White, 2013 Ohio 3027, 2013 Ohio App. LEXIS 3083 (2d Dist. July 12, 2013).*

Defendant has no standing to challenge the alleged pretextual stop of a car he wasn’t even in and had no possessory interest. State v. Silvas, 2013-NMCA-093, 2013 N.M. App. LEXIS 61 (July 10, 2013), Certiorari Granted, September 20, 2013, No. 34,271.

Probable cause existed on the totality of circumstances. Defendant viewed all the factors only in isolation in his argument. State v. Wilson, 404 S.W.3d 917 (Mo. App. 2013).*

Defendant was stopped for almost hitting a police car, and reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing was evident to the officers [but not to me], and a patdown resulted in a plain feel of a bag of drugs. Nix v. State, 2013 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 57 (July 12, 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.