S.D.Fla.: Target of the search doesn’t get to be the first one asked for consent when he’s arrested

Officers did not have to ask the target of the search for consent before getting it from somebody with apparent authority. He was arrested for a shooting, handcuffed, and put into a police car. This was standard protocol, and the court doesn’t find that it was being devious to avoid his potential denial when he wasn’t even asked. United States v. Perpall, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87535 (S.D. Fla. June 12, 2013):

Although Perpall did not testify at the hearing and did not call Ferguson as a witness either, his argument is that the police officers purposefully did not ask him for consent to search the apartment he had been staying in for approximately two weeks. He also suggests that the officers intentionally removed him from the apartment area and hustled him into a squad car so that he did not have the opportunity to refuse to give consent to the search of Ferguson’s apartment.

The Undersigned does not find that the officers had a devious, underhanded purpose in placing Perpall into a squad car after arresting him in connection with a shooting. More specifically, there is no evidence to establish that the officers’ actual purpose in placing the handcuffed Perpall into a squad car was to deprive him of the ability to object to the search of an apartment leased by another person (and where he had been staying for approximately two weeks). To the contrary, placing a handcuffed suspect into a squad car after arrest is a routine step in the standard arrest protocol.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.