W.D.Mo.: SW for hotel room necessarily included room’s safe

Search warrant for hotel room included the locked safe in the closet without having to specifically mention it. United States v. Tapia, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168118 (W.D. Mo. November 2, 2012).

Defendant can’t win his 2255 for failing to file a suppression motion where he can’t show that he’d have won it. Ables v. United States, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167211 (S.D. Ohio November 26, 2012).*

The frisk of defendant’s car was justified by defendant’s furtive movement that appeared to the officer to remove a gun from his waistband and put it under the car seat. Officers approached the car because of the way it was parked, and the furtive movement apparently was in response to that. The gun was seen in plain view through the window. United States v. Brown, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167017 (W.D. Pa. November 26, 2012)* (All in all a confusing opinion. The court ends up calling it a “search incident” after describing facts that made the search incident doctrine inapplicable. There was plenty to support the search here without calling it that.)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.