D.Minn.: Drug sales outside defendant’s apartment creates inference of drugs inside

The defendant was alleged to have engaged in three drug sales with a CI right outside his apartment door. This led to a fair inference that drugs would be found in defendant’s apartment. United States v. Dedrick, 840 F. Supp. 2d 482 (D. Minn. 2012).

Merely being the “emergency contact” on a storage unit lease did not give the defendant standing to challenge its search. Defendant was neither lessor nor owner of the unit. United States v. McMahan, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151724 (E.D. Tenn. December 7, 2011).*

One defendant gave a false name and SSN when asked, and it is clear from the video that there was consent to search the vehicle for their identities. One defendant’s reaching for her shoes and purse did not constitute a limitation on consent for the vehicle. United States v. Jackson, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5849 (W.D. Va. January 18, 2012).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.