W.D.La.: Israel’s capture of Palestinian cell phone calls was foreign search in case here

Israel officials captured Palestinian cell phone traffic that partly resulted in this indictment. That was sufficiently a foreign search. United States v. Al-Muhtadi, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 258887 (W.D. La. Nov. 10, 2026).

The complained of omissions from the affidavit for search warrant weren’t material to the probable cause finding. If the information had been included, the warrant still wouldn’t have been overbroad. United States v. Subil, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 258589 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 10, 2026).*

Probable cause was shown on the totality of information in the affidavit for warrant despite defendant’s claim some allegations were too general or had possible innocent explanations. United States v. McGauley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 258291 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 30, 2026),* adopted, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 256740 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 9, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.