N.D.Tex.: Merely being a federal contractor doesn’t make employer’s search state action

Being a federal contractor wasn’t enough to make defendant food service company a state actor. Ellis v. Ben E. Keith Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217957 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 2025).

Officers had a warrant for the place searched and found defendant’s bag in a cooler there, one he had on him earlier. It was covered by the warrant where it was found. United States v. Alston, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218079 (D.S.C. Nov. 5, 2025).*

Consent isn’t involuntary just because the officer has the defendant’s ID when asked. Torralba v. State, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 8324 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov. 5, 2025).* (Interestingly, this opinion is a string of quotes from other cases following “Affirmed.” I saw that once before in a fictional opinion in the NLJ back in the 1990s. Surely they’ve done this before, but I just haven’t seen it.)

This entry was posted in Consent, Private search, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.