TX4: Video belied the officer’s testimony about defendant’s driving, and the stop was not justified

The officer testified that the defendant completely crossed over into the other lane, and that justified the stop. The video showed the wheels just barely crossing, and that was not sufficient for a stop under state law. State v. Sanders, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 8115 (Tex. App. — San Antonio October 12, 2011).*

Defendant’s host of issues are rejected: “(1) the application for the search warrant contains material misstatements of fact; (2) the Affiant omitted material information from the Affidavit; (3) there was a lack of corroboration on information received; (4) the Affidavit contained excessively stale information; (5) there was no nexus between the items sought and criminal activity associated to those items; (6) the officer used the search for business-related records as a pretext to search for other evidence; and (7) the officers searched beyond the scope of the Search Warrant.” United States v. Murphy, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117943 (S.D. Ohio October 12, 2011).*

There was cause to stop the defendant’s vehicle for a traffic offense, and he consented to a search of the vehicle. United States v. Valdez, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118328 (D. Neb. September 12, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.