DE: PO’s failure to comply with juvenile probation search regulations on parental involvement justified suppression

The state’s policy on parental involvement in juvenile probation searches wasn’t complied with, and the juvenile’s home search is suppressed. The state’s assertion of exigency is rejected. Sharp v. State, 2024 Del. LEXIS 412 (Dec. 16, 2024).

The court won’t apply the Fourth Amendment reasonable expectation of privacy standard to a civil email discovery dispute over attorney-client privilege. Flannery Assocs., LLC v. Barnes Family Ranch Assocs., LLC, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226127 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2024).*

“The facts Officer Wanschura provided in the T-Mobile Tracking Warrant Affidavit were not lengthy, but the Court agrees with the magistrate judge that they supplied a sufficient basis ‘to give rise to the inference that Mr. Henderson was involved in the June 20 shooting’ and that ‘evidence of such criminal activity reasonably would be found’ in the T-Mobile data. (R&R at 12-14) (citing United States v. Brackett, 846 F.3d 987, 992 (8th Cir. 2017) (‘[A]n issuing judge may draw reasonable inferences from the totality of the circumstances in determining whether probable cause exists to issue a warrant.’). The Affidavit referred to the ongoing investigation into the June 20 shooting and cross-referenced information related to Mr. Henderson obtained from a Facebook warrant.” United States v. Henderson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226723 (D. Minn. Dec. 16, 2024).*

This entry was posted in E-mail, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.