CA6: Minor property damage from executing a SW doesn’t make it 4A unreasonable

Minor property damage from executing a search warrant does not violate the Fourth Amendment. Carnett v. Chester Cty., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 22720 (6th Cir. Sep. 5, 2024):

Carnett also complains of substantial damage done to the residence and his property within, but the photos provided do not support his contention that the defendants caused unreasonable damage. Nevertheless, “officers executing search warrants on occasion must damage property in order to perform their duty.” Brown v. Battle Creek Police Dep’t, 844 F.3d 556, 575-76 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Dalia v. United States, 441 U.S. 238, 258 (1979)). Property damage becomes a Fourth Amendment violation when it is unreasonable. Id. The small hole that the deputies made in the ceiling to determine if Colton was in the attic was not unreasonable given the circumstances, particularly in light of their prior unsuccessful attempt to open the attic door. Carnett also asserts that his laptop was taken and not returned to him, but he presented no evidence to support this assertion or explain why the seizure of the laptop would have been outside the scope of the search warrant or otherwise violative of the Fourth Amendment.

This entry was posted in Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.