OH12: Defendant consented to 3 patdowns, and he did not unequivocally revoke consent

Defendant was patted down three times. “[W]e find that appellant’s conduct fell short of a reasonably unequivocal revocation of consent and find no error in the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress evidence.” State v. McCree, 2011 Ohio 1993, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 1700 (12th Dist. April 25, 2011).*

Defendant was slowly driving a forklift on the shoulder of the road without a “slow moving vehicle” emblem, which does not apply only to farm vehicles. His DWI conviction was affirmed because there was cause for this stop. Harvey v. State, 2011 WY 72, 250 P.3d 167 (2011).*

Defendant had no standing in the premises of another. The authority he cites doesn’t hold what he says. United States v. Soto, 779 F. Supp. 2d 208 (D. Mass. 2011).*