Arrest of wrong man for a murder revealed drugs and guns and was still reasonable

The arrest of the defendant for a murder, that it turned out he did not commit, but for which there was probable cause, was still valid under Hill v. California. Two witnesses mistakenly identified him as involved in the murder, and he was identified as having the tattoo “Outlaw” on his neck. The fact that defendant did not have such a tattoo did not dissipate PC on the spot because of the possibility the tattoo was not permanent. Guns and drugs were found after the arrest, and the arrest was objectively reasonable, despite the fact defendant was not the right man. United States v. Sykes, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80322 (E.D. La. November 2, 2006).

Arrest warrant for defendant authorized officers to enter his house and look in closets for him. United States v. Itayem, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80323 (N.D. Ohio November 2, 2006).

While the question was close, the District Court finds that consent was valid and not coerced. The police told defendant’s cotenant that they had to enter to check the premises, and she offered the keys. United States v. Williams, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80244 (W.D. Tenn. November 1, 2006).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.