OR: The fact some people lie is not RS

The officer had no subjective or objective reasonable suspicion that the vehicle defendant was driving, his mother’s, was without her permission, just become some people lie. State v. Smith, 308 Ore. App. 84 (Dec. 16, 2020).

Defendant was claimed to have threated a fast food worker with violence in the store and said he was coming back with a gun. He came back and the police came too. He didn’t have a weapon on his person, and the automobile exception permitted a search of his car. “Anderson has not disputed the facts proffered by the government in opposition to the motion to suppress. As a consequence, no evidentiary hearing was required and the motion could be decided based on the briefs of the parties and supporting documentation.” United States v. Anderson, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238480 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 18, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.