S.D.N.Y.: Looking at a bottle on a shelf exceeded protective sweep

Officers conducting a protective sweep looked up and saw a lactose bottle on a shelf, pulled it down, looked at it, and seized it. This was unreasonable under the protective sweep doctrine. United States v. Guzman, 724 F. Supp. 2d 434 (S.D. N.Y. 2010).

Opening an unmarked pill bottle during an inventory was reasonable. State v. Escoto, 2010 La. LEXIS 1664 (July 6, 2010).

While the case law is divided on whether a person not listed on the rental agreement has standing to contest a search of the car, in this case, the defendant made no effort to show standing, so he had none. State v. Jackson, 42 So. 3d 368 (La. 2010).*

Defendant failed to show standing in a hallway closet in his apartment building. State v. Harris, 122 Conn. App. 521, 3 A.3d 82 (2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.