OH9: Pro se 4A argument never presented to trial court not considered

Pro se argument that the search warrant was invalid wasn’t preserved by a motion to suppress in the trial court. State v. Daniels, 2020-Ohio-1176, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1097 (9th Dist. Mar. 30, 2020).*

Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim (among others) on appeal that don’t appear in the complaint, that aren’t further specified in the brief as to their source, aren’t considered on appeal. Carbajal v. McCann, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 9764 (10th Cir. Mar. 30, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Standards of review. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.