Nexus for house found from absence of robbery proceeds in car

Nexus for search of defendant’s house under a search warrant was based on the fact that the vehicle allegedly used in an armed robbery had none of the proceeds, and it was logical, given the time difference between the robbery and the search of the vehicle, that the money would be in his house. United States v. Sears, 191 Fed. Appx. 800 (10th Cir. August 17, 2006) (unpublished).

Police stopped a minivan with fictitious plates suspected of having been used in an armed robbery. They got consent to search and seized nothing. Later in the day, the driver of the minivan was picked out of a photo array as being involved, and the police traced the van back to defendant’s girlfriend, from whom he was separated, but she had half ownership interest in the van and she thought it was parked. They asked her for consent, and it was based on her apparent authority to consent. They searched it when they found it, and the search was valid on her consent. Id.*
Id.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.