NJ: Passenger’s furtive movements justify ordering him from car

A passenger’s furtive movements can justify ordering him out of the car. As an aside, the court chides defense counsel for not addressing the issue before appeal so the parties could develop the record. [Most other states would say it was waived.] State v. Bacome, 2017 N.J. LEXIS 120 (Jan. 31, 2017).

Defendant’s sentence cannot be enhanced for refusing a blood test under Birchfield. Commonwealth v. Giron, 2017 PA Super 23, 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 60 (Jan. 31, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.