M.D.La.: “Provoked” flight different than “unprovoked” flight; def could ignore officer and run away where no RS

Officers had no reasonable suspicion to stop defendant in a high crime area, even after he fled from them when they told him to stop. This was “provoked” flight, contrary to Wardlow’s “unprovoked” flight. “When a vehicle approaches someone in a high-crime area, and the occupants yell, ‘Hey, come here,’ the Court believes it is reasonable for the person approached to ‘go about his business’ by reversing course and walking a different direction, and even running away from the unknown vehicle. Royer, 460 U.S. at 498.” United States v. Turner, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33036 (M.D.La. March 15, 2016).

The trial court erred in concluding defendant did not consent to a breath test. State v. Depol, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 148 (March 15, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.