OR: Even if stop invalid, false name given to officer is attenuated

While the officer at the suppression hearing couldn’t remember the basis for the traffic stop, the crux was that defendant gave a false name when arrested, and that was an independent illegality attenuated from the stop. The false name charge would not be suppressed, and the court of appeals is reversed, and the trial court ruling reinstated. State v. Suppah, 358 Ore. 565, 2016 Ore. LEXIS 123 (Feb. 19, 2016), revg 264 Ore. App 510, 334 P3d 463 (2014) (en banc).

Defendant had to travel to Cincinnati for court appearances, and he says this undermines the government’s argument that he was traveling there for drug trafficking, too.. One is not exclusive to the other, and it was a fair inference defendant was doing just that. Thus, there was probable cause for GPS warrants on cars. Also, a UPS package was reasonably detained in transit, and that led to a dog sniff which gave probable cause. United States v. Lawson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21034 (N.D.Cal. Feb. 18, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Attenuation, GPS / Tracking Data. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.