FL2: PC to arrest included knowledge of evidence on iPhone, so phone could be seized on exigent circumstances

Police had probable cause to arrest defendant for sex offenses with children, and the PC included the fact that his smartphone contained images of the crimes. When he was arrested, there was exigency for seizing his cell phone pending a search warrant. Hanifan v. State, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13915 (Fla. 2d DCA September 18, 2015).

There was [obviously] probable cause to stop and arrest defendant for robbery. “Here, Det. Clapp and Det. McDonald had probable cause to stop Moore’s vehicle and arrest Moore on April 10, 2014, based on the information provided to them by Sgt. Gray and their team leader. The officers had been provided a physical description of Moore, the color, make, and model of the vehicle he drove, and a picture of Moore. In addition, and more importantly, they were informed that the victim in the Family Dollar Store robbery had positively identified Moore as the person who robbed her at gunpoint on March 30, 2014, and left in a gold or tan SUV.” United States v. Moore, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124519 (W.D.Tenn. August 5, 2015),* adopted 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123464 (W.D. Tenn. Sept. 16, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.